Review



single-guide rna plasmid ligated into bbsi-digested phu6-grna  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc single-guide rna plasmid ligated into bbsi-digested phu6-grna
    Single Guide Rna Plasmid Ligated Into Bbsi Digested Phu6 Grna, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/single-guide rna plasmid ligated into bbsi-digested phu6-grna/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single-guide rna plasmid ligated into bbsi-digested phu6-grna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    Addgene inc single-guide rna plasmid ligated into bbsi-digested phu6-grna
    Single Guide Rna Plasmid Ligated Into Bbsi Digested Phu6 Grna, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/single-guide rna plasmid ligated into bbsi-digested phu6-grna/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single-guide rna plasmid ligated into bbsi-digested phu6-grna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Addgene inc single-guide rna plasmid
    Single Guide Rna Plasmid, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/single-guide rna plasmid/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single-guide rna plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Addgene inc single-guide rna plasmid pcdna3.1-hlbcpf1
    Single Guide Rna Plasmid Pcdna3.1 Hlbcpf1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/single-guide rna plasmid pcdna3.1-hlbcpf1/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single-guide rna plasmid pcdna3.1-hlbcpf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Addgene inc plasmid expressing both cas9 and single-guide rna (sgrna) targeting the tcf4 exon 2
    Plasmid Expressing Both Cas9 And Single Guide Rna (Sgrna) Targeting The Tcf4 Exon 2, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/plasmid expressing both cas9 and single-guide rna (sgrna) targeting the tcf4 exon 2/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    plasmid expressing both cas9 and single-guide rna (sgrna) targeting the tcf4 exon 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Addgene inc guide rnas
    Guide Rnas, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/guide rnas/product/Addgene inc
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    guide rnas - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc single guide rna sgrna library
    Single Guide Rna Sgrna Library, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/single guide rna sgrna library/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single guide rna sgrna library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc mouse crispr ppil2 single guide rnas sgrna
    Mouse Crispr Ppil2 Single Guide Rnas Sgrna, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse crispr ppil2 single guide rnas sgrna/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse crispr ppil2 single guide rnas sgrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Addgene inc crispr cas9 single guide rnas sgrnas
    Crispr Cas9 Single Guide Rnas Sgrnas, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/crispr cas9 single guide rnas sgrnas/product/Addgene inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    crispr cas9 single guide rnas sgrnas - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc cloning nsun2 targeting single guide rna sequences
    Cloning Nsun2 Targeting Single Guide Rna Sequences, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cloning nsun2 targeting single guide rna sequences/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cloning nsun2 targeting single guide rna sequences - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Addgene inc single guide rna grna for cxcr4
    ATBL uptake is <t>CXCR4</t> dependent. (A) CXCR4 expression in the indicated MM cell lines was evaluated using flow cytometry ( n = 3/cell line). (B) A schematic illustration of the transwell migration assay in which MM cell migration in response to SDF-1 chemokine is assessed in the presence of AMD-L. (C) CAG cells were treated with AMD-L (1.62 ± 0.35 × 10 12 liposomes/ml), AMD-F (25 μM), EMPTY-L (1.52 ± 0.96 × 10 12 liposomes/ml) or control for 90 min. Migration of the treated cells was assessed by the transwell assay at the 24 h time point ( n = 5/group). (D) In vitro cellular uptake of Cy5 labeled AMD-L (4.86 ± 1.04 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) versus EMPTY-L (4.56 ± 1.19 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) was assessed in RPMI, CAG and U266 MM cell lines by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). (E) A schematic illustration of the 4-step procedure to evaluate MM cell apoptosis in the presence of different treatments. (F) The late apoptosis profile of RPMI cells treated for 48 h with the indicated types of liposomes was assessed by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). (G) Viability of RPMI MM cells was assessed in the presence of increasing concentrations of BTZ-F and ATBL. IC50 measurements per treatment are indicated ( n = 3/group). (H–I) CXCR4 expression on RPMI cells knocked down for CXCR4 (RPMI-KD) and their wild-type counterpart (RPMI-WT*) was assessed by flow cytometry. A representative histogram is shown in H, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown in I ( n = 3–4/group). (J) In vitro cellular uptake of rhodamine labeled AMD-L (4.86 ± 1.04 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) compared to EMPTY-L (4.56 ± 1.19 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) was assessed in MM RPMI-KD and RPMI-WT* cells by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). Results are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in A, C and F with multiple comparisons test. Two-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in D and J with multiple comparisons test. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis in I, adjusted p-value; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns; not significant; MM, multiple myeloma; RPMI, RPMI8226; RPMI-KD, RPMI8226 CXCR4 knockdown cells; RPMI-WT*, RPMI8226 wild type cells that underwent the same genetic manipulation as the RPMI-KD cells, but without the inclusion of the guide RNA; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; ATBL, AMD targeted bortezomib liposomes; BTZ-F, bortezomib free drug; BTZ-L, bortezomib liposomes; AMD-F, AMD3100 free drug; AMD-L, AMD3100 liposomes; EMPTY-L, empty nontargeted liposome; Control, vehicle.
    Single Guide Rna Grna For Cxcr4, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/single guide rna grna for cxcr4/product/Addgene inc
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single guide rna grna for cxcr4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ATBL uptake is CXCR4 dependent. (A) CXCR4 expression in the indicated MM cell lines was evaluated using flow cytometry ( n = 3/cell line). (B) A schematic illustration of the transwell migration assay in which MM cell migration in response to SDF-1 chemokine is assessed in the presence of AMD-L. (C) CAG cells were treated with AMD-L (1.62 ± 0.35 × 10 12 liposomes/ml), AMD-F (25 μM), EMPTY-L (1.52 ± 0.96 × 10 12 liposomes/ml) or control for 90 min. Migration of the treated cells was assessed by the transwell assay at the 24 h time point ( n = 5/group). (D) In vitro cellular uptake of Cy5 labeled AMD-L (4.86 ± 1.04 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) versus EMPTY-L (4.56 ± 1.19 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) was assessed in RPMI, CAG and U266 MM cell lines by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). (E) A schematic illustration of the 4-step procedure to evaluate MM cell apoptosis in the presence of different treatments. (F) The late apoptosis profile of RPMI cells treated for 48 h with the indicated types of liposomes was assessed by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). (G) Viability of RPMI MM cells was assessed in the presence of increasing concentrations of BTZ-F and ATBL. IC50 measurements per treatment are indicated ( n = 3/group). (H–I) CXCR4 expression on RPMI cells knocked down for CXCR4 (RPMI-KD) and their wild-type counterpart (RPMI-WT*) was assessed by flow cytometry. A representative histogram is shown in H, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown in I ( n = 3–4/group). (J) In vitro cellular uptake of rhodamine labeled AMD-L (4.86 ± 1.04 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) compared to EMPTY-L (4.56 ± 1.19 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) was assessed in MM RPMI-KD and RPMI-WT* cells by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). Results are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in A, C and F with multiple comparisons test. Two-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in D and J with multiple comparisons test. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis in I, adjusted p-value; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns; not significant; MM, multiple myeloma; RPMI, RPMI8226; RPMI-KD, RPMI8226 CXCR4 knockdown cells; RPMI-WT*, RPMI8226 wild type cells that underwent the same genetic manipulation as the RPMI-KD cells, but without the inclusion of the guide RNA; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; ATBL, AMD targeted bortezomib liposomes; BTZ-F, bortezomib free drug; BTZ-L, bortezomib liposomes; AMD-F, AMD3100 free drug; AMD-L, AMD3100 liposomes; EMPTY-L, empty nontargeted liposome; Control, vehicle.

    Journal: ACS Nano

    Article Title: Bone Marrow-Targeted Liposomes Loaded with Bortezomib Overcome Multiple Myeloma Resistance

    doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c10597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ATBL uptake is CXCR4 dependent. (A) CXCR4 expression in the indicated MM cell lines was evaluated using flow cytometry ( n = 3/cell line). (B) A schematic illustration of the transwell migration assay in which MM cell migration in response to SDF-1 chemokine is assessed in the presence of AMD-L. (C) CAG cells were treated with AMD-L (1.62 ± 0.35 × 10 12 liposomes/ml), AMD-F (25 μM), EMPTY-L (1.52 ± 0.96 × 10 12 liposomes/ml) or control for 90 min. Migration of the treated cells was assessed by the transwell assay at the 24 h time point ( n = 5/group). (D) In vitro cellular uptake of Cy5 labeled AMD-L (4.86 ± 1.04 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) versus EMPTY-L (4.56 ± 1.19 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) was assessed in RPMI, CAG and U266 MM cell lines by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). (E) A schematic illustration of the 4-step procedure to evaluate MM cell apoptosis in the presence of different treatments. (F) The late apoptosis profile of RPMI cells treated for 48 h with the indicated types of liposomes was assessed by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). (G) Viability of RPMI MM cells was assessed in the presence of increasing concentrations of BTZ-F and ATBL. IC50 measurements per treatment are indicated ( n = 3/group). (H–I) CXCR4 expression on RPMI cells knocked down for CXCR4 (RPMI-KD) and their wild-type counterpart (RPMI-WT*) was assessed by flow cytometry. A representative histogram is shown in H, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown in I ( n = 3–4/group). (J) In vitro cellular uptake of rhodamine labeled AMD-L (4.86 ± 1.04 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) compared to EMPTY-L (4.56 ± 1.19 × 10 11 liposomes/ml) was assessed in MM RPMI-KD and RPMI-WT* cells by flow cytometry ( n = 3/group). Results are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in A, C and F with multiple comparisons test. Two-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in D and J with multiple comparisons test. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis in I, adjusted p-value; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns; not significant; MM, multiple myeloma; RPMI, RPMI8226; RPMI-KD, RPMI8226 CXCR4 knockdown cells; RPMI-WT*, RPMI8226 wild type cells that underwent the same genetic manipulation as the RPMI-KD cells, but without the inclusion of the guide RNA; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; ATBL, AMD targeted bortezomib liposomes; BTZ-F, bortezomib free drug; BTZ-L, bortezomib liposomes; AMD-F, AMD3100 free drug; AMD-L, AMD3100 liposomes; EMPTY-L, empty nontargeted liposome; Control, vehicle.

    Article Snippet: A single guide RNA (gRNA) for CXCR4 (forward: 5′CACCG AGGGGACTATGACTCCATGA 3′; reverse: 5′AAAC TCATGGAGTCATAGTCCCCT C 3′) was cloned into the lentiCRISPR v2 vector plasmid (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA Cat# 52961) containing puromycin resistance using the Golden Gate assembly reaction as described.

    Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Transwell Migration Assay, Migration, Liposomes, Control, Transwell Assay, In Vitro, Labeling, Fluorescence, Two Tailed Test, Knockdown, Concentration Assay

    In vivo therapeutic effect of ATBL in MM bearing mice. (A) A schematic illustration of the experimental design for evaluating ATBL therapeutic effect in vivo : Eight-week-old SCID mice were systemically irradiated (250 rad). After 24 h, MM RPMI cells (5 × 10 6 /mouse) were intravenously injected. On day 21, when sufficient tumor burden was detected by IVIS, mice were intravenously administered with ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg), BTZ-L (1.93 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or control, once a week for a 5-week period. (B–C) Tumor growth and expansion was assessed using the IVIS imaging system on the indicated days ( n = 5–7 mice/group). (D) At end point, mice were sacrificed, and bone paraffin sections were immunostained with CD138+ (brown) or H&E (Scale bar, 200 μm). (E) In a parallel experiment, SCID mice were treated with ATBL, BTZ-F or control at the same concentrations described in (A) starting on day 28 for 5 weeks. Survival was monitored ( n = 4–6 mice/group). (F) A schematic illustration of the experimental design: Eight-week-old SCID mice were systemically irradiated (250 rad). After 24 h, RPMI-KD or RPMI-WT* MM cells were intravenously injected (5 × 10 6 /mouse). When sufficient tumor burden was detected by IVIS (day 21 and for RPMI-WT*; day 28 for RPMI-KD), ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or control was intravenously administrated once a week for 4 weeks. (G) Representative IVIS images of RPMI-KD and RPMI-WT* tumor bearing mice at 21 and 14 days, respectively, post MM cell inoculation. (H) Tumor growth in mice described in F was assessed using the IVIS imaging system on the indicated days ( n = 5–6 mice/group). (I) Bar graph indicating tumor size at end point (day 91). Shown are the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, median survival, and p-values using the Wilcoxon statistical test. Results in C and H are presented as mean ± SE. Two-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in C and H with multiple comparisons test. Results in I are presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis in I, adjusted p-value; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns, not significant; MM, multiple myeloma; RPMI, RPMI8226; RPMI-KD, RPMI8226 CXCR4 knockdown cells; RPMI-WT*, RPMI8226 wild type cells that underwent the same genetic manipulation as the RPMI-KD cells, but without the inclusion of the guide RNA; ATBL, AMD targeted bortezomib liposomes; BTZ-F, bortezomib free drug; BTZ-L, bortezomib liposomes; Control, vehicle.

    Journal: ACS Nano

    Article Title: Bone Marrow-Targeted Liposomes Loaded with Bortezomib Overcome Multiple Myeloma Resistance

    doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c10597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo therapeutic effect of ATBL in MM bearing mice. (A) A schematic illustration of the experimental design for evaluating ATBL therapeutic effect in vivo : Eight-week-old SCID mice were systemically irradiated (250 rad). After 24 h, MM RPMI cells (5 × 10 6 /mouse) were intravenously injected. On day 21, when sufficient tumor burden was detected by IVIS, mice were intravenously administered with ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg), BTZ-L (1.93 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or control, once a week for a 5-week period. (B–C) Tumor growth and expansion was assessed using the IVIS imaging system on the indicated days ( n = 5–7 mice/group). (D) At end point, mice were sacrificed, and bone paraffin sections were immunostained with CD138+ (brown) or H&E (Scale bar, 200 μm). (E) In a parallel experiment, SCID mice were treated with ATBL, BTZ-F or control at the same concentrations described in (A) starting on day 28 for 5 weeks. Survival was monitored ( n = 4–6 mice/group). (F) A schematic illustration of the experimental design: Eight-week-old SCID mice were systemically irradiated (250 rad). After 24 h, RPMI-KD or RPMI-WT* MM cells were intravenously injected (5 × 10 6 /mouse). When sufficient tumor burden was detected by IVIS (day 21 and for RPMI-WT*; day 28 for RPMI-KD), ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or control was intravenously administrated once a week for 4 weeks. (G) Representative IVIS images of RPMI-KD and RPMI-WT* tumor bearing mice at 21 and 14 days, respectively, post MM cell inoculation. (H) Tumor growth in mice described in F was assessed using the IVIS imaging system on the indicated days ( n = 5–6 mice/group). (I) Bar graph indicating tumor size at end point (day 91). Shown are the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, median survival, and p-values using the Wilcoxon statistical test. Results in C and H are presented as mean ± SE. Two-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in C and H with multiple comparisons test. Results in I are presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis in I, adjusted p-value; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns, not significant; MM, multiple myeloma; RPMI, RPMI8226; RPMI-KD, RPMI8226 CXCR4 knockdown cells; RPMI-WT*, RPMI8226 wild type cells that underwent the same genetic manipulation as the RPMI-KD cells, but without the inclusion of the guide RNA; ATBL, AMD targeted bortezomib liposomes; BTZ-F, bortezomib free drug; BTZ-L, bortezomib liposomes; Control, vehicle.

    Article Snippet: A single guide RNA (gRNA) for CXCR4 (forward: 5′CACCG AGGGGACTATGACTCCATGA 3′; reverse: 5′AAAC TCATGGAGTCATAGTCCCCT C 3′) was cloned into the lentiCRISPR v2 vector plasmid (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA Cat# 52961) containing puromycin resistance using the Golden Gate assembly reaction as described.

    Techniques: In Vivo, Irradiation, Injection, Liposomes, Control, Imaging, Two Tailed Test, Knockdown

    ATBL biodistribution and toxicity. (A) A schematic illustration of the biodistribution experimental design, as detailed in Materials and Methods. Eight-week old SCID mice were systemically irradiated at a dose of 250 rad. After 24 h, MM RPMI cells (5 × 10 6 /mouse) were intravenously injected. On day 21, when sufficient tumor burden was detected by IVIS, rhodamine-labeled ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg), AMD-L (8.10 ± 1.74 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or EMPTY-L (7.59 ± 1.98 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) were intravenously administrated. After 24 h, mice were sacrificed, and bone-marrow (BM) cells were flushed from the bones and analyzed by flow cytometry ( n = 5 mice/group). (B) The percentage of rhodamine positive cells in the BM is presented. (C) The percentage of rhodamine positive MM cells expressing CXCR4 in the BM is presented. (D) A schematic illustration of dose limiting toxicity experimental design, as detailed in Materials and Methods. (E) The percent in body weight change of mice treated with control or increasing doses of ATBL over a 7-day period. ATBL doses corresponded to equivalent doses of BTZ 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mg/kg, calculated based on liposome concentrations of 9.77 ± 2.16 × 10 12 , 1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 , 3.91 ± 0.86 × 10 13 , 9.77 ± 2.16 × 10 13 (liposomes/kg), respectively ( n = 5 mice/group). (F) A schematic illustration of toxicity profiling experimental design, as detailed in Materials and Methods. (G) The average weight of 8 week old BALB/c mice treated with ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or control administered once a week for 4-week period ( n = 5 mice/group) was assessed weekly. (H) The WBC count of mice treated as in G was measured at end point (after 4 weeks of treatment). Results are presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis in B and C. Two-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in E and G with multiple comparisons test. One-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in H with multiple comparisons test, adjusted p-value; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns, not significant; BM, bone marrow; MM, multiple myeloma; RPMI, RPMI8226; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; WBC, white blood cell; ATBL, AMD targeted bortezomib liposomes; BTZ-F, bortezomib free drug; AMD-L, AMD3100 liposomes; EMPTY-L, empty nontargeted liposome; Control, vehicle.

    Journal: ACS Nano

    Article Title: Bone Marrow-Targeted Liposomes Loaded with Bortezomib Overcome Multiple Myeloma Resistance

    doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c10597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ATBL biodistribution and toxicity. (A) A schematic illustration of the biodistribution experimental design, as detailed in Materials and Methods. Eight-week old SCID mice were systemically irradiated at a dose of 250 rad. After 24 h, MM RPMI cells (5 × 10 6 /mouse) were intravenously injected. On day 21, when sufficient tumor burden was detected by IVIS, rhodamine-labeled ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg), AMD-L (8.10 ± 1.74 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or EMPTY-L (7.59 ± 1.98 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) were intravenously administrated. After 24 h, mice were sacrificed, and bone-marrow (BM) cells were flushed from the bones and analyzed by flow cytometry ( n = 5 mice/group). (B) The percentage of rhodamine positive cells in the BM is presented. (C) The percentage of rhodamine positive MM cells expressing CXCR4 in the BM is presented. (D) A schematic illustration of dose limiting toxicity experimental design, as detailed in Materials and Methods. (E) The percent in body weight change of mice treated with control or increasing doses of ATBL over a 7-day period. ATBL doses corresponded to equivalent doses of BTZ 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mg/kg, calculated based on liposome concentrations of 9.77 ± 2.16 × 10 12 , 1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 , 3.91 ± 0.86 × 10 13 , 9.77 ± 2.16 × 10 13 (liposomes/kg), respectively ( n = 5 mice/group). (F) A schematic illustration of toxicity profiling experimental design, as detailed in Materials and Methods. (G) The average weight of 8 week old BALB/c mice treated with ATBL (1.95 ± 0.43 × 10 13 liposomes/kg) or control administered once a week for 4-week period ( n = 5 mice/group) was assessed weekly. (H) The WBC count of mice treated as in G was measured at end point (after 4 weeks of treatment). Results are presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis in B and C. Two-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in E and G with multiple comparisons test. One-way ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis in H with multiple comparisons test, adjusted p-value; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns, not significant; BM, bone marrow; MM, multiple myeloma; RPMI, RPMI8226; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; WBC, white blood cell; ATBL, AMD targeted bortezomib liposomes; BTZ-F, bortezomib free drug; AMD-L, AMD3100 liposomes; EMPTY-L, empty nontargeted liposome; Control, vehicle.

    Article Snippet: A single guide RNA (gRNA) for CXCR4 (forward: 5′CACCG AGGGGACTATGACTCCATGA 3′; reverse: 5′AAAC TCATGGAGTCATAGTCCCCT C 3′) was cloned into the lentiCRISPR v2 vector plasmid (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA Cat# 52961) containing puromycin resistance using the Golden Gate assembly reaction as described.

    Techniques: Irradiation, Injection, Labeling, Liposomes, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Control, Two Tailed Test